UNCTAD and World Bank publish long-awaited papers on odious debt
ADD YOUR COMMENT >>
Imprimir print   Enviar send   Correct 
Source: Eurodad
Tue Sep 18 2007

UNCTAD and the World Bank have both published long-awaited research papers on the issue of odious debt. Both papers have been financed in part by the Government of Norway. The publication of this work follows much confusion for CSOs working on this issue worldwide, because of the way that both institutions formaly carried out the research.

In relation to content, both papers begin by reviewing a number of instances over the past century where the concept of odious debt has been invoked to declare a sovereign debt null and void or to support the repudiation of sovereign debt.

According to Eurodad view, "the main message to emerge from the World Bank discussion paper is that international law does not generally provide for the repudiation of debts on the grounds of their being odious, but this should not deter lenders and sovereign borrowers from acting in a variety of ways to ensure that loans are used for the benefit of the borrowing states and not to subjugate their populations or enrich the corrupt."

"The UNCTAD paper is less dismissive of the doctrine of odious debt. Indeed it suggests that – although complex – there are often strong grounds to make the case that a debt is odious. Where such cases have been rejected, it is because the individual sovereign debt in question has not been considered odious rather than because international law does not recognise the concept of odious debt as such. The paper concludes however that there is no obvious legal forum for the adjudication or settlement of claims of odiousness but that such claims might appropriately be raised in bilateral or multilateral negotiations on debt relief, or they could be adjudicated in the context of arbitration or domestic litigation."

See Eurodad news on these papers for further information

-> UNCTAD paper: The concept of odious debt in public international law

-> World Bank paper: Odious debt: Some considerations

Related information:

-> Debt: The repudiation option, by Third World Network


-> Odious debt: Definition, application and context, by Ashfaq Khalfan at EURODAD Annual Conference 2006 (pdf format)

Imprimir print   Enviar send   correct 
ADD YOUR COMMENT >>


Choike information
In-depth reports
Financing for Development
The opportunity that came up in Monterrey can turn into a road to nowhere without an injection of political will.
External debt
In the last two decades, the external debt has been a huge problem that third world countries have to face. This situation has generated a “spiral of poverty” where once inside it, is very difficult for developing countries to get out.
FTAA: a new colonialism?
The sovereignty of the countries and peoples of Latin America is at stake.
UN reform
More than 60 years after its founding, the United Nations should rebuild its credibility and relevance before the 21st century world.
World Bank
The World Bank's main self-proclaimed objective is to eradicate poverty. Yet, evidence suggests that its programmes often harm the poor and the environment.
International Monetary Fund - IMF
The IMF is one of the most powerful international organizations. Its policies change the lives of millions of people in developing countries.
Millennium Development Goals - MDGs
A comprehensive list of resources from the United Nations and civil society organizations.

  IFIs Latin American Monitor
This area of Choike is possible thanks to the Mott Foundation
Choike is a project of the Third World Institute
www.choike.org | info@choike.org | Phone / Fax: +598 (2) 412-4224 | Dr. Juan Paullier 977, Montevideo URUGUAY